Apologies if there is another thread already devoted to this idea, but:
I've been thinking a lot since the finale... if the flash at the end actually represented the bomb going off (as I believe it did), and if the bomb hasn't *always* gone off (i.e. the bomb detonating was indeed a change), then... what? What will change?
I don't think it can be as simple as Jack seemingly believes -- that "none of this ever happened". It can't be a clean "Reset" button, where all our characters simply revert to landing in L.A. with no memory of anything that happened in the last 5 seasons of the TV show. How lame would that be?
So on this topic, I just watched another Abrams/Lindelhof show that premiered recently--namely the new "Star Trek" movie. As many of you no doubt already know, the plot of that movie also hinges on time travel--specifically, that movie fully embraces the mind-bending idea that "what happened, DIDN'T necessarily happen." Maybe that's a red herring for Lost, or maybe (as others have speculated) it's telling. What do you all think?
Read the next paragraph only if you're not concerned about star trek spoilers...
I'm wondering if--along the lines of the latest Star Trek plot--those who have died in 1977 will still be dead, but those who are still alive will flash back to the present, retaining all the memories from seasons 1-5, but will find that they are now living alongside versions of themselves who have had significantly different pasts. (A la Spock in the movie.) I think there would be some potential for interesting storytelling there. Anyone agree?