Author Topic: Charlotte Should not be born yet.  (Read 19362 times)

Offline hyperform

  • DHARMA Scientist
  • ******
  • Posts: 5272
    • View Profile
Re: Charlotte Should not be born yet.
« Reply #150 on: March 24, 2009, 10:56:22 PM »
ummmm, scroll up 4 posts, that is exactly what I posted, only I just put the link. ???

Offline tonysee200x

  • Red Shirt
  • **
  • Posts: 328
    • View Profile
Re: Charlotte Should not be born yet.
« Reply #151 on: March 24, 2009, 11:23:58 PM »
ummmm, scroll up 4 posts, that is exactly what I posted, only I just put the link. ???

Ya, sorry about that.  I posted in under the Namaste and they moved it. I didn't look here for it, but figured no one would see it if I posted it here.

Offline jugdish

  • Dharma VIP
  • *******
  • Posts: 16716
    • View Profile
Re: Charlotte Should not be born yet.
« Reply #152 on: March 24, 2009, 11:39:37 PM »
But I posted it 6 before you!!1

Offline E.S.B.

  • DHARMA Work Man (or Woman)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4632
    • View Profile
Re: Charlotte Should not be born yet.
« Reply #153 on: March 25, 2009, 12:25:02 AM »
Wow, I guess we won't be seeing Ms. Mader returning for a guest-spot any time soon!

Offline Mrs Hume

  • DHARMA Work Man (or Woman)
  • *****
  • Posts: 3556
    • View Profile
Re: Charlotte Should not be born yet.
« Reply #154 on: March 25, 2009, 01:44:04 AM »
yeah hyperform posted the link.  when I read it I couldn't believe this happened and the drama it caused!
« Last Edit: March 25, 2009, 01:45:35 AM by Mrs Hume »

Offline The_Hatch_Monkey

  • In the Loop
  • ****
  • Posts: 1852
    • View Profile
Re: Charlotte Should not be born yet.
« Reply #155 on: March 25, 2009, 03:54:21 AM »
I really hope it all gets resolved and doesn't hurt any further storyline that they might need her for.  Got to be careful who you sever ties with.  I wonder how far that apology will go with her...from her statement, she seemed really mad.  I thought the retraction was a little weak sauce.

Offline DIZZYBECKSTER

  • DHARMA Work Man (or Woman)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4243
    • View Profile
Re: Charlotte Should not be born yet.
« Reply #156 on: March 25, 2009, 08:18:55 AM »
retcon


<giggle> never heard of that before - excellent, a plan B!

Offline BobBX542

  • DHARMA Work Man (or Woman)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4070
    • View Profile
Re: Charlotte Should not be born yet.
« Reply #157 on: March 25, 2009, 10:59:17 AM »
I think that as long as she's gone, we're better off. I wasn't a big fan of her in the first place from that look she had on her effin face when she first landed on the island, and then she spoke, and that did her in as far as I'm concerned. The age thing was a bit of a mystery, but now that it is over and done with, I'm glad we won't be seeing her anymore...I hope.

Offline jugdish

  • Dharma VIP
  • *******
  • Posts: 16716
    • View Profile
Re: Charlotte Should not be born yet.
« Reply #158 on: March 25, 2009, 11:40:37 AM »
I got the impression they are covering for her. They took the hit. I believe the original story that she changed the date or at least put up a big stink about it. THey are taking the blame just to be nice.

Offline JBRam

  • Island Native
  • *
  • Posts: 30614
    • View Profile
TPTB Officially Messed Up
« Reply #159 on: March 25, 2009, 02:12:55 PM »
Hey guys, I don't know if you've seen this yet: http://www.tvovermind.com/tv-news/lost/trouble-on-the-island-deceased-lost-beauty-accuses-former-bosses-of-cover-up

So we have confirmation of two things: the little girl WAS supposed to be Charlotte, and TPTB are not infallible.

Offline jugdish

  • Dharma VIP
  • *******
  • Posts: 16716
    • View Profile
Re: Charlotte Should not be born yet.
« Reply #160 on: March 25, 2009, 02:50:35 PM »
You are only the 4th or 5th to start this idea. We have covered it!!!

Offline BobBX542

  • DHARMA Work Man (or Woman)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4070
    • View Profile
Re: Charlotte Should not be born yet.
« Reply #161 on: March 25, 2009, 04:29:45 PM »
You are only the 4th or 5th to start this idea. We have covered it!!!

Calm your self man. Was it really necesarry to put that third exclamation point on there?? I mean 2, sure, but three, that's a little over the line.

Remember when I made my little Eulogy about the thread?? I kind of assumed you would have locked it.

Offline hyperform

  • DHARMA Scientist
  • ******
  • Posts: 5272
    • View Profile
Re: Charlotte Should not be born yet.
« Reply #162 on: March 25, 2009, 06:02:25 PM »
I got the impression they are covering for her. They took the hit. I believe the original story that she changed the date or at least put up a big stink about it. THey are taking the blame just to be nice.

Michael Emerson backed her up, and said it was in his script too, so unless it's a conspiracy, I think she is correct. She maybe over reacted, but is correct none the less.

Offline Mrs Hume

  • DHARMA Work Man (or Woman)
  • *****
  • Posts: 3556
    • View Profile
Re: Charlotte Should not be born yet.
« Reply #163 on: March 25, 2009, 08:20:46 PM »
Hyper, can you point me in the direction of that interview with Michael Emerson, you know how I like to hear his interview's :)

Offline jugdish

  • Dharma VIP
  • *******
  • Posts: 16716
    • View Profile
Re: Charlotte Should not be born yet.
« Reply #164 on: March 25, 2009, 09:23:09 PM »
You are only the 4th or 5th to start this idea. We have covered it!!!

Calm your self man. Was it really necesarry to put that third exclamation point on there?? I mean 2, sure, but three, that's a little over the line.

Remember when I made my little Eulogy about the thread?? I kind of assumed you would have locked it.

You are correct. I overreacted with that third exclamtion point.

(but JB was the third person to start a thread on the same topic already covered and I have to keep merging them and then I don't have time to just relax and read others post. Then I never got the rating summary done this week and i feel guilty about that and  ahhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)