Author Topic: Last Lost Standing II  (Read 86998 times)

Offline Ladybug

  • Dharma VIP
  • *******
  • Posts: 20841
    • View Profile
Re: Last Lost Standing II
« Reply #1425 on: March 21, 2007, 05:51:29 PM »
That is pretty messed up!  Okay, this is what I come up with the current count:

44 Alex Rousseau
08 Claire Littleton
109 John Locke
102 Sayid Jarrah


althought that is WAY off what the votes should be.  there should be 200 votes.  hmmm....  i may have to do a little investigating...

Offline Cardacct

  • DHARMA Work Man (or Woman)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4956
    • View Profile
Re: Last Lost Standing II
« Reply #1426 on: March 21, 2007, 05:55:39 PM »
44 Alex Rousseau
07 Claire Littleton
109 John Locke
103 Sayid Jarrah

+1 Sayid
-1 Claire

Sorry guys, my bad.  I quoted the wrong post!!!  I concur with this count.

Yeah, we're off by three.  I already tracked two of them down.  Hurley got added instead of subtracted on one post WAY back when.  I wrote it all about 20 pages back.

...and there were 26 characters this time, so it should be 260 total.
« Last Edit: March 21, 2007, 05:57:59 PM by Cardacct »

Offline Ladybug

  • Dharma VIP
  • *******
  • Posts: 20841
    • View Profile
Re: Last Lost Standing II
« Reply #1427 on: March 21, 2007, 05:57:45 PM »
at least it's 3 and not 63 like i originally thought.  i'm okay with 3.  i just thought maybe you were cheating.   >:(  i was going to have to tell those guys on the single sites how dishonest you can be.   ;)   :-*

Offline LostGirlDeb

  • Dharma VIP
  • *******
  • Posts: 14531
  • Live Together Die Alone
    • View Profile
Re: Last Lost Standing II
« Reply #1428 on: March 21, 2007, 06:00:56 PM »
I vote that we bring back Sawyer and end this game :P

(aggghhhhh drooling over Sawyer)


I have not even been voting until today...I hope I didn't mess it up

Offline jugdish

  • Dharma VIP
  • *******
  • Posts: 16716
    • View Profile
Re: Last Lost Standing II
« Reply #1429 on: March 21, 2007, 06:19:44 PM »
You said you want Kate brought back and declared the winner. I can do that for you ;D

Offline LostGirlDeb

  • Dharma VIP
  • *******
  • Posts: 14531
  • Live Together Die Alone
    • View Profile
Re: Last Lost Standing II
« Reply #1430 on: March 21, 2007, 06:21:53 PM »
You said you want Kate brought back and declared the winner. I can do that for you ;D

Oh no!! that already happend!!  Deja vu
This time it should be Sawyer
Can you do that? and make him my sex slave? 

Offline uofapiglet

  • DHARMA Work Man (or Woman)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4063
    • View Profile
Re: Last Lost Standing II
« Reply #1431 on: March 21, 2007, 06:24:42 PM »
You said you want Kate brought back and declared the winner. I can do that for you ;D

Funny... ;D

We've all become habitualized to this game... I think we just need something new... or some cool new twist... maybe just less players or more voting opportunities... I give up... :D

Offline Cardacct

  • DHARMA Work Man (or Woman)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4956
    • View Profile
Re: Last Lost Standing II
« Reply #1432 on: March 21, 2007, 06:56:19 PM »
44 Alex Rousseau
06 Claire Littleton
109 John Locke
104 Sayid Jarrah

+1 Sayid
-1 Claire

Offline Cardacct

  • DHARMA Work Man (or Woman)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4956
    • View Profile
Re: Last Lost Standing II
« Reply #1433 on: March 21, 2007, 06:58:01 PM »
I think it would be fun if we looked at the time of our voting post, and if we happen to post with the seconds on one of "the numbers," we get a free vote!

So, since my seconds was at 19, I wouldn't, but if it were 4 8 15 16 23 or 42, I could immediately post again, and then if that post was on the numbers, I could post again!  Etc.

Offline uofapiglet

  • DHARMA Work Man (or Woman)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4063
    • View Profile
Re: Last Lost Standing II
« Reply #1434 on: March 21, 2007, 07:16:30 PM »
I think it would be fun if we looked at the time of our voting post, and if we happen to post with the seconds on one of "the numbers," we get a free vote!

So, since my seconds was at 19, I wouldn't, but if it were 4 8 15 16 23 or 42, I could immediately post again, and then if that post was on the numbers, I could post again!  Etc.

That's a fun new idea... But I wonder how often it would happen... It'd make sense if you voted on the actual minute... at least it's something new... :)

Offline uofapiglet

  • DHARMA Work Man (or Woman)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4063
    • View Profile
Re: Last Lost Standing II
« Reply #1435 on: March 21, 2007, 07:17:04 PM »
44 Alex Rousseau
05 Claire Littleton
109 John Locke
105 Sayid Jarrah

+1 Sayid
-1 Claire

Offline Cardacct

  • DHARMA Work Man (or Woman)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4956
    • View Profile
Re: Last Lost Standing II
« Reply #1436 on: March 21, 2007, 07:32:10 PM »
Hey!  If we were playing that way, you could have voted again!

I thought minute would be too easy.  It could be planned too much, but to get the second would be luck and it would speed up the game just a little bit.  You have a one in ten chance of getting it on the second, so statistically every ten posts would have a bonus post.

Offline jules778

  • Red Shirt
  • **
  • Posts: 285
    • View Profile
Re: Last Lost Standing II
« Reply #1437 on: March 21, 2007, 07:36:15 PM »
45 Alex Rousseau
04 Claire Littleton
109 John Locke
105 Sayid Jarrah

+1 Alex
-1 Claire

Offline jules778

  • Red Shirt
  • **
  • Posts: 285
    • View Profile
Re: Last Lost Standing II
« Reply #1438 on: March 21, 2007, 07:36:53 PM »
oh do I get to vote again?

Offline Cardacct

  • DHARMA Work Man (or Woman)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4956
    • View Profile
Re: Last Lost Standing II
« Reply #1439 on: March 21, 2007, 07:37:43 PM »
No, because we haven't officially implemented this, but you would have!  See!!!  That's awesome!

*pm-ing JBRam with suggestion*  Please submit your opinion of this twist on the thread so we can know if people like the idea or not...
« Last Edit: March 21, 2007, 07:40:10 PM by Cardacct »