Author Topic: Time line mentioned by Juliette.  (Read 7756 times)

Offline jugdish

  • Dharma VIP
  • *******
  • Posts: 16716
    • View Profile
Time line mentioned by Juliette.
« on: February 08, 2007, 01:14:50 AM »
Jeff Jensen wrote.

According to recent statements by the producers, and per the timeline that's been suggested in the show, the events that are currently transpiring in Lost are taking place in late November 2004, possibly very early December 2004. At the end of ''Not In Portland,'' a character reveals the exact amount of time that he/she has been on the island. When you do the math, you will get an Estimated Date that comes suspiciously close to the exact date of an infamous, real-world catastrophe. Coincidence?

So we know he was talking about Juliette and her 3 years. This takes us right about 9-11 dosen't it??

Offline firemanandlostfan

  • Red Shirt
  • **
  • Posts: 191
    • View Profile
Re: Time line mentioned by Juliette.
« Reply #1 on: February 08, 2007, 01:19:48 AM »
wow excellent find Juggy.

I wonder what the significance is?

Please no one bring up the magnetic anomoly causing the planes to fly into the twin towers....

Offline this is some crazy stuff

  • In the Loop
  • ****
  • Posts: 1111
    • View Profile
Re: Time line mentioned by Juliette.
« Reply #2 on: February 08, 2007, 01:19:59 AM »
yes but this still does not really explain anything about what the date is on the island.

Offline JBRam

  • Island Native
  • *
  • Posts: 30614
    • View Profile
Re: Time line mentioned by Juliette.
« Reply #3 on: February 08, 2007, 01:21:11 AM »
Yes, it certainly does, Juggy.

Add 3 years, 2 months and 28? days to 9/11/01 and the current island date would be 12/8/04, right?

Offline JBRam

  • Island Native
  • *
  • Posts: 30614
    • View Profile
Re: Time line mentioned by Juliette.
« Reply #4 on: February 08, 2007, 01:22:17 AM »
wow excellent find Juggy.

I wonder what the significance is?

Please no one bring up the magnetic anomoly causing the planes to fly into the twin towers....
Well, this couldn't be true anyways, since this is when Juliet arrived on the island, not when the button failed to be pressed on time.

I doubt there is any real significance, but rather another Easter Egg.

Offline Cardacct

  • DHARMA Work Man (or Woman)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4956
    • View Profile
Re: Time line mentioned by Juliette.
« Reply #5 on: February 08, 2007, 01:43:55 AM »
Oh, good job on that one.  Nice Easter Egg.

Offline jugdish

  • Dharma VIP
  • *******
  • Posts: 16716
    • View Profile
Re: Time line mentioned by Juliette.
« Reply #6 on: February 08, 2007, 01:19:06 PM »
It is something to remeber and to see if it comes up again in the future.

Offline uofapiglet

  • DHARMA Work Man (or Woman)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4063
    • View Profile
Re: Time line mentioned by Juliette.
« Reply #7 on: February 08, 2007, 04:28:00 PM »
According to Lostpedia:

Juliet says she has been on the island for 3 years, 2 months, and 28 days, which would make her arrival time September 5th, 2001.

Jeff Jensen clued us in to this by saying that one of the characters would mention her time on the island and it would be near that of a real-world catastrophe... but I'm not sure of it's significance to 911, the statement just helps us determine how long Juliet's been on the island and clues us in to how long the rest of our Losties have been stranded given the real-time implications...

Offline jugdish

  • Dharma VIP
  • *******
  • Posts: 16716
    • View Profile
Re: Time line mentioned by Juliette.
« Reply #8 on: February 08, 2007, 04:44:10 PM »
Her arrival to the island is very close to a catastrophe as he hinted towards. Is it signifigant, I don't know.

Offline E-Rich

  • In the Loop
  • ****
  • Posts: 1058
    • View Profile
Re: Time line mentioned by Juliette.
« Reply #9 on: February 08, 2007, 08:36:56 PM »
It HAS to be some kind of connection.  I don't think this would be just another little thing...it is a significant part of the timeline.  Thanks Jugs.

Offline jugdish

  • Dharma VIP
  • *******
  • Posts: 16716
    • View Profile
Re: Time line mentioned by Juliette.
« Reply #10 on: February 08, 2007, 11:07:59 PM »
ANytime. Love that I found some stuff :)

Offline snowyjoe

  • DHARMA Work Man (or Woman)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2250
    • View Profile
Re: Time line mentioned by Juliette.
« Reply #11 on: February 10, 2007, 01:22:15 AM »
i find the timeline annoying...

Offline PrincessLeia

  • Dharma VIP
  • *******
  • Posts: 19233
    • View Profile
Re: Time line mentioned by Juliette.
« Reply #12 on: February 10, 2007, 02:29:29 AM »
The thorough research on & reliability of the timelines on this site are what initially attracted me to this site.

THANK YOU, JUGDISH.  :)

Offline jules778

  • Red Shirt
  • **
  • Posts: 285
    • View Profile
Re: Time line mentioned by Juliette.
« Reply #13 on: February 10, 2007, 05:14:51 PM »
Don't know if this is of any importance, but notice that the timeline for some bring it to possibly 12/08/04   ... another catastrophe in history is Pearl Harbor on 12/07/41... not saying that it means anything,,, but since we're talking dates... it could be a day earlier and this could be a date to look at.

mindsparkle

  • Guest
Re: Time line mentioned by Juliette.
« Reply #14 on: February 10, 2007, 05:45:37 PM »
In an interview, I don't know when exactly, the writer Damon and Carlton spoke of the correlations between lost and 9/11... I'm sure the video is out there somewhere... and again, the writers like to drop in little tidbit of info that are of interest to them and not necessarily the story line...

Excerpt from May 6, 2005 "Elizabeth Vargas Talks With the Cast and Crew of the Surprise Hit"
http://lost-media.com/modules.php?name=News&file=print&sid=725

Producers say another reason for the show's appeal is that the series reflects some serious social issues.

"In the sort of post-9/11 world, the sense that we all live with some lurking threat out there I think that hangs over all of our lives," said executive producer Carlton Cuse. "And I think that the people on this island have that, too."