Author Topic: not a ton to talk about?! lol  (Read 15640 times)

Offline LostGirlDeb

  • Dharma VIP
  • *******
  • Posts: 14531
  • Live Together Die Alone
    • View Profile
Re: not a ton to talk about?! lol
« Reply #45 on: May 24, 2006, 01:58:23 PM »
Yes I think we are on to something here concerning the 4 that were
chosen to come back with Micahel
I am listening to Kevin & Bean on KROQ here and someone just called in and said the exact same thing as Geronimo above and that some of us agreed to and added to.  How weird ...was it one of you?
I wonder if we are even going to get any of this info tonight or will we have to wait until next season?
I strongly agree with Geronimo though that those are the only 4 that
had interaction with their "visions" ::)

Offline firemanandlostfan

  • Red Shirt
  • **
  • Posts: 191
    • View Profile
Re: not a ton to talk about?! lol
« Reply #46 on: May 24, 2006, 01:59:41 PM »
Leave it to a "shrink" to bebunk my theory..... just kiddin

Offline Geronimo Jackson

  • DHARMA Scientist
  • ******
  • Posts: 9753
    • View Profile
Re: not a ton to talk about?! lol
« Reply #47 on: May 24, 2006, 02:03:19 PM »
Quote
I strongly agree with Geronimo though that those are the only 4 that
had interaction with their "visions"
No I believe all the visions whether in real timeor in dreams are being manipulated by theOthers,so iadded a bunch of people and disqualified Hurley.
I don't think Locke's experiment on Boone counts either.

Offline Stray

  • Onlooker
  • *
  • Posts: 20
    • View Profile
Re: not a ton to talk about?! lol
« Reply #48 on: May 24, 2006, 02:07:20 PM »
I don't think I saw someone mention this, but Sayid also saw Walt when he ran after Shannon and he's not one of the ones they want.

My first thought of the "four" was they wanted the trouble makers out of the way. Yet, Hurley is on the list so that did not add up.

- Stray

Offline Geronimo Jackson

  • DHARMA Scientist
  • ******
  • Posts: 9753
    • View Profile
Re: not a ton to talk about?! lol
« Reply #49 on: May 24, 2006, 02:38:15 PM »
Now that makes sense excpet Hurley but he knows about the numbers.

Offline jugdish

  • Dharma VIP
  • *******
  • Posts: 16716
    • View Profile
Re: not a ton to talk about?! lol
« Reply #50 on: May 24, 2006, 02:53:13 PM »
Sayid would have to be considered a trouble maker so that can't be it.

Offline Geronimo Jackson

  • DHARMA Scientist
  • ******
  • Posts: 9753
    • View Profile
Re: not a ton to talk about?! lol
« Reply #51 on: May 24, 2006, 02:55:54 PM »
True he knows about Rosseau, and as some people's therioes about her being an Other outcast  turn out to be true he would be a threat, and he knows about Alex.But again no one knows Alex is among them.

Offline Pandora

  • DHARMA Work Man (or Woman)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2653
    • View Profile
Re: not a ton to talk about?! lol
« Reply #52 on: May 24, 2006, 03:21:12 PM »
Leave it to a "shrink" to bebunk my theory..... just kiddin

Haha. :)  I don't think you should think of it as debunking, though, since that one was just based on my opinion, and I'm just a fan, just like you... even almighty sledge is not part of TPTB, so we're all guessing a lot of the time.  Whether or not we come close to the mark is something only the writers & producers know!

Offline andersinlost

  • Red Shirt
  • **
  • Posts: 164
    • View Profile
Re: not a ton to talk about?! lol
« Reply #53 on: May 24, 2006, 03:31:32 PM »
If this is one great big experiment then maybe rosseaus in on it as well, i mean how a distress signal cant be picked up for 16 years!!! is beyond me.