Author Topic: infection = possession  (Read 15235 times)

Offline Creflo

  • Survivor
  • ***
  • Posts: 606
    • View Profile
infection = possession
« on: February 09, 2010, 10:32:20 PM »
...by ______?

Offline taki1379

  • Red Shirt
  • **
  • Posts: 146
    • View Profile
Re: infection = possession
« Reply #1 on: February 09, 2010, 10:40:59 PM »
It looked like he blew some Ashe over sayid. At first I thought he might be smokie

Offline lostjava

  • Background Extra
  • *
  • Posts: 37
    • View Profile
Re: infection = possession
« Reply #2 on: February 09, 2010, 10:51:10 PM »
I think they suspect it's smokey. 

But it might be Jacob.  Since Jacob did say that Sayid must survive. 

Offline taki1379

  • Red Shirt
  • **
  • Posts: 146
    • View Profile
Re: infection = possession
« Reply #3 on: February 09, 2010, 10:52:29 PM »
So are we to believe that the pill was poisen? 

Offline jamesl

  • Survivor
  • ***
  • Posts: 724
    • View Profile
Re: infection = possession
« Reply #4 on: February 09, 2010, 10:53:05 PM »
yeah, ash
I wondered about that
was it supposed to stick ? remove what's left of the gunshot wound ? cause him pain like alcohol on a wound ?

I thought he passed the test by being injured and not turning into a smokey
I was really suprised when they said he failed

Offline lostfromthestart

  • DHARMA Scientist
  • ******
  • Posts: 5065
    • View Profile
Re: infection = possession
« Reply #5 on: February 09, 2010, 11:02:49 PM »
yeah, ash
I wondered about that
was it supposed to stick ? remove what's left of the gunshot wound ? cause him pain like alcohol on a wound ?

I thought he passed the test by being injured and not turning into a smokey
I was really suprised when they said he failed
That's what I thought, but apparently he failed the test.  Hmmmm

Offline vickilynn

  • DHARMA Work Man (or Woman)
  • *****
  • Posts: 3880
    • View Profile
Re: infection = possession
« Reply #6 on: February 09, 2010, 11:03:19 PM »
yeah, ash
I wondered about that
was it supposed to stick ? remove what's left of the gunshot wound ? cause him pain like alcohol on a wound ?

I thought he passed the test by being injured and not turning into a smokey
I was really suprised when they said he failed

Seems like Smokey can't tolerate the ash, so I thought that was just part of the test to see if Sayid could

Offline taki1379

  • Red Shirt
  • **
  • Posts: 146
    • View Profile
Re: infection = possession
« Reply #7 on: February 09, 2010, 11:06:07 PM »
Apparently he is turning evil

Offline jugdish

  • Dharma VIP
  • *******
  • Posts: 16716
    • View Profile
Re: infection = possession
« Reply #8 on: February 09, 2010, 11:09:10 PM »
It appears to me that they are comparing Sayid and Claire to Danielle not to smokie. That he is going loony like Danielle did.

Offline jamesl

  • Survivor
  • ***
  • Posts: 724
    • View Profile
Re: infection = possession
« Reply #9 on: February 09, 2010, 11:10:16 PM »
It appears to me that they are comparing Sayid and Claire to Danielle not to smokie. That he is going loony like Danielle did.

ah, very good point

Offline JMart

  • In the Loop
  • ****
  • Posts: 1664
    • View Profile
Re: infection = possession
« Reply #10 on: February 09, 2010, 11:14:11 PM »
It appears to me that they are comparing Sayid and Claire to Danielle not to smokie. That he is going loony like Danielle did.

i dont think so.. danielle went loony bc of her circumstances, not dying and coming back to life.

Offline taki1379

  • Red Shirt
  • **
  • Posts: 146
    • View Profile
Re: infection = possession
« Reply #11 on: February 09, 2010, 11:18:10 PM »
So did Claire die, come back to life and then get "infected"?

Offline jugdish

  • Dharma VIP
  • *******
  • Posts: 16716
    • View Profile
Re: infection = possession
« Reply #12 on: February 09, 2010, 11:21:35 PM »
Not sure, She disappeared after the house was blown up. But she was not brought to the temple as far as we know, so that is different than Sayid.


We have seen her with Christian, which appears to be connected to smokie. I don't know. I am confused.

Offline taki1379

  • Red Shirt
  • **
  • Posts: 146
    • View Profile
Re: infection = possession
« Reply #13 on: February 09, 2010, 11:24:08 PM »
I like the promos that say " the time for questions is over".

Offline hyperform

  • DHARMA Scientist
  • ******
  • Posts: 5272
    • View Profile
Re: infection = possession
« Reply #14 on: February 09, 2010, 11:24:13 PM »
or did they dunk her in the iced tea spring and die too